When you see a politician resorting to epistolic expressions, be sure that he has nothing to say about the political substance. He's moving to his place. «Someone, somewhere, once»The day before yesterday, as part of his new communication attack, A. Tsipras said:
«My involvement in the commons and politics has an element of romance and claim to dream»And Charles Marx, in 1871, referring to the Communists of Paris, spoke of «The sky raid»The left. «Secretariat» is full of similar expressions, with most of them recorded in May '68. These romantic left-cut intelligences are so retro, they don't even move young people.
Of course Tsipras made no raid on the sky, but a raid on the citizens' pockets when he ruled. But that's what Chakalotos and Varoufakis are responsible for. This past is trying to erase, but with the invocation of romance and dream, it is very difficult to see it succeed. After all, for a leader who has ruled and seeks to rule again, such tusks offer nothing. In this way, leaders of small parties who are free from the cold realism of a government speech may speak. One «Prime Minister pending» must be specific and committed to its objectives.
I understand his attempt to show a familiar, friendly person in the context of rebranding, but I guess this communication strategy has ended. A. Tsipras tried to reintroduce, in all matters, to the citizens, an effort with a high degree of difficulty, which he knew in the first place. Whether or not this project has succeeded will not be seen by «Human» confessions, but acceptance or not of his party's political program.
The clear and specific to some leaders creates problems. On the contrary, ambiguity, the fluidity of the vision, which is most often wanted, is convenient because it creates fewer commitments and everyone interprets meanings as he wants. This is one of the reasons that A. Tsipras did not want, although he could, to form a parliamentary group. In that case he should have taken a position on every government bill. That is, to give his political mark.
This course of deliberate ambiguity has an expiry date. A. Tsipras and his associates should determine, for example, the limit of excessive wealth they will tax, as well as the limits of the middle class. And if they don't, their political opponents—And mostly their old comrades—They'll make them do it.
We said, "It's good. «Ithaca», sweet are dreams, but sometime Alexis must speak politically. And politics is the «dialectic of the specific»To remember Czech philosopher Karel Kosik.
